Investment clarity,
built around the client.
Model income potential, compare risk and review alternative maturities—using one consistent investment brief across four RatesLab profiles.
Build an investment brief
Use illustrative parameters. They adjust existing published economics; they do not place trades or create a client account.
Investment Solutions at a Glance
All four alternatives use the same selected capital, modeled risk budget and comparable rate-path scenario.
Not a forecast or maximum loss. Each investment alternative shows its own modeled path drawdown under the selected scenario.
Side-by-side investment outcomes
Published analytics, synchronized to the selected capital, drawdown budget and rate path. Period returns reflect each product's own term.
| MODELED METRIC | Core 6M | Core 12M | Defensive 6M | Defensive 12M |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading modeled outcomes… | ||||
Risk versus annualized return
Same selected scenarioEach point represents one alternative. Horizontal position reflects modeled peak-to-trough drawdown magnitude—not a guaranteed loss limit.
Modeled portfolio MTM paths
Return on starting capitalCalendar-date mode compares the published daily MTM paths on one calendar axis; each investment ends at its own maturity. No extension to a common expiry.
All outputs are hypothetical projections sourced from RatesLab' published model bundles, not live executable prices, a guarantee of capital or actual portfolio returns. Modeled drawdown is not a worst-case loss. Six-month and twelve-month outcomes have different holding periods; compare them on a consistent time basis before drawing conclusions.
Explore the full rate-outcome universe
Review published Fed and investment-bank scenarios for one investment alternative at a time. Compare return, interim risk and cash-relative value without assigning probabilities.
| PUBLISHED RATE SCENARIO | Period return | Cash-relative P&L | Modeled max DD | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading scenarios… | ||||
Worst/best means among published modeled scenarios only; it is not a probability-weighted forecast or a maximum possible loss. Selecting a scenario updates the client brief, four-product comparison and MTM charts above.
6M + Roll versus 12M Hold
Compare two six-month investments with holding a twelve-month investment, using one consistent modeled comparison horizon.
Both approaches, one 12-month window
Portfolio index · 100 at inceptionThe published 6M + Roll and 12M Hold paths are shown on the same actual calendar dates. Unlike the individual-product MTM chart, this is a common-horizon model.
What the second six months must earn
Loading second-half break-even threshold…
Future volatility sensitivity
| Case | Rolled return | Roll advantage | Rolled max DD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Loading… | |||
Prepare a client-ready illustration
Turn this investment brief into a professional, clearly-labelled hypothetical analysis with source dates, risk disclosures and an optional reference-model appendix.
Waiting for published model data.